With
the radically polarised process of Brazil's presidential elections
and the victory of an openly neo-fascist candidate, an important
concept emerges that needs to be better understood within the
Brazilian and international activist community: The Anti-Workers’
Party (PT) rage.
The
formation of the PT and the New Republic
To
better understand this subject, it is important to return to the
first half of the 1980s, when Brazil was reaching the end of the
military dictatorship period and going through the process of
re-democratization. This period is known as the “New Republic”
period. The end of the dictatorship in Brazil occurred in a scenario
of economic crisis and at the same time of the collapse of various
dictatorships in Latin America. In Brazil, this decline was
accelerated by a great rise in social movements despite their
repression in the dictatorship. One of the most prominent social
groups was composed by the metallurgic workers known as “the
metallurgical belt of the ABC” (metropolitan region of São Paulo).
Numerous strikes and protests led by the group spread through the
most diverse social sectors of the country, overcoming the power of
repression by the police and the barrier imposed by media censorship.
Other groups followed: from landless peasants to students, as well as
the progressive wing of the Catholic Church, intellectuals and
artists, community movements and workers from the most diverse
categories.
The
political impact of this struggle was enormous, boosting a historical
reorganization of social movements in Brazil. Workers from various
factories and categories rejected the rotten union structures
(usually linked to the dictatorship) and created new unions such as
the CUT (free translation: Central of Workers). From this shift of
power and reorganisation of the unions, came the idea of creating
a new political party. An independent party from the bourgeoisie, and
that unified the diverse social and popular struggles that the
country was going through. The Workers' Party (PT) was therefore
created under the leadership of Lula da Silva, a metallurgist from
the Northeast of the country, who was at the forefront of the social
movements and became a political prisoner multiple times during the
military dictatorship.
Throughout
the 1980s, the PT was consolidating itself as the main leftist party
of the New Republic. Its strategy was to get to power via the
democratic electoral route. In the first elections in the country
after the military dictatorship ended, in 1987, Lula reached the
second round of the process, being defeated by Fernando Collor.
Collor would undergo Impeachment two years later due to a corruption
scandal. Lula later ran again and lost to Fernando Henrique Cardoso
the 1994 and 1998 elections. With the impact of the economic crisis
of the late 1990s and early 00s, Lula was finally elected president
in October 2002.
The
13 years of PT governments
During
the 1990s, PT was already beginning to gain space in the political
scenario winning various local and national elections. In many cases,
the elected representatives put in practice the social welfare
policies and the democratic participation of the population in
decision making, such as the participatory budget currently used in
several countries. They also launched changes in public healthcare
such as the unified system of ambulances (SAMU), inspired by the
model used in France, launching in Porto Alegre first and expanding
nationwide after 2003.
However,
months before the election that led Lula to the presidency, PT
released a document entitled "Letter to Brazilians". In
this document, PT committed itself not to alter the pillars of the
economic agenda that had been applied by the previous conservative
governments (for example, from the party PSDB), calming down the
fears that leading economic groups could still have regarding an
eventual PT government.
Now in
government, PT continued to broadly apply the social-democratic
agenda but with some adjustments. During Lula's second
administration, the world commodities market experienced an unusual
boom. The Brazilian economy, strongly based on this type of product
(oil, gas, minerals, etc.), had grown significantly. The PT
government took advantage of the economic growth and increased
investments in social policies. The measures did not change the
country's economic structure but allowed the social inclusion of
millions of families who were living below the poverty line. It gave
access to consumption and goods that a large part of the population
had never dreamed of. Sectors of the middle class consequently began
to develop an Anti-Workers’ Party rage based on the traditionally
retrograde mentality shared by this social class. They struggled to
tolerate "poor people in airports and universities", both
seen as privileges reserved to the few. But this new economic
scenario of the country went from strength to strength, which left
the middle class feeling politically marginalized. Yet the “Cansei”
(I’m fed up) marches, a movement of the upper-middle class of São
Paulo, typically dressed in green and yellow and protesting against
Lula’s presidency, did not reach 100 attendees.
The
economic crisis and June 2013
However,
the economic growth reached an end. The great global economic crisis
of 2007 changed the landscape in Brazil. The commodities market,
especially oil, gradually returned to pre-growth levels. Dilma
Rousseff, Lula’s successor, was then in charge of the government.
Lula had already served two consecutive terms - the maximum allowed
by Brazilian law.
The
population was beginning to feel the decline in living standards and
to realise that the government was failing to maintain the same
economic growth from previous years. There was a feeling that the
bill was being paid by the population. The mega-events planned for
the country (World Cup and Olympic Games), turned from a source of
pride to an example of waste of public funds. All that while the
basic needs of the population were not being met. In June of 2013, a
student mass protest against the increase of the bus fares in São
Paulo was harshly repressed by the Military Police. However, it
quickly gained momentum and spread throughout the country. It was the
beginning of the so-called “Jornadas de Junho” (Journeys of
June), the greatest social mobilization in Brazil’s history: tens
of millions of people took the streets demanding further social
changes. The protests were very diverse and composed by people from
all parts of the political spectrum. In general, the protests of June
had in common a progressive agenda. However, the far-right took
advantage of the political moment and infiltrated in the process
instigating the Anti-Workers’ Party rage, blaming the left for all
the social discontent and lack of perspective for a better future.
The
2014 Elections and the Impeachment of Dilma Rousseff
In the
2014 electoral process, Dilma reached the second round against the
PSDB candidate in a fiercely contested election. Large part of the
upper middle class had adhered to the Anti-Workers’ Party rage. In
the second round, PT adopted an anti-austerity speech, more to the
left, and reversed the rejection to its policies. At the end of the
elections, Dilma adopted a very different agenda from what had been
defended in her campaign up to that point, disappointing many of her
supporters.
The
bourgeoisie, on the other hand, wanted an even stronger pace of
fiscal adjustment. It encouraged and radicalised the Anti-Workers’
Party rage, giving support to Dilma Rousseff's impeachment.
Nowadays
In the
current elections, with the failure of the traditional conservative
parties (such as PSDB), the space was occupied by a neo-fascist
alternative: Jair Bolsonaro. To enable his rise, the campaign
supported by the international fake News industry (with the
participation of Stephen Bannon, former Trump aide) and hate speech.
Quickly the campaign took surreal proportions. The far-right took
advantage of the desperation and lack of perspective of large sectors
of the population to inflame hatred against their "enemy
within": the black, the poor, the women and the LGBTQ. And the
left activists fighting the rise of extremism were all labelled as
"PT supporters." The far-right encourages an unhealthy
Anti-Workers’ Party rage to facilitate its policy of brutal
repression to the social movements, finally making it possible to
consolidate their political project.
In
this delicate political moment, we understand that the role of the
left is to fight the reactionary and neo-fascist president. It does
not mean embracing PT with its past mistakes and current limitations.
It does not even mean supporting a possible new government from this
party. The PT's alliances, manifesto and recent practices show that
the party has not yet realised the need to reinvent itself from
within - as for example the UK Labour Party has. It is necessary to
overcome the limitations of PT in the future, but today the priority
is to fight the neo-fascism.
The
post-election period
The
far-right in Brazil used the Anti-Workers’ Party rage as an
ideological basis for its strength. Brazil has elected a neo-fascist
government. Parallel to that, social movements gain strength and
resist, the left reorganizes itself.
A
movement of more than 4 million people and led by women stood up to
this political threat without defending PT and its alliances. The
#EleNao campaign fought the rise of fascism.
No
matter what the Bolsonaro government will be, the work of building a
new political scenario that goes beyond the polarisation focused on
very few parties continues and the task of defending basic democratic
rights will be the order of the day. The #EleNao campaign has already
shown the way.
We have a long road ahead of us, and we have confidence and willingness to keep fighting.■
Márcia Alves, feminist-socialist activist from Sao João de Meriti, Baixada Fluminense ( peripheral area in Greater Rio de Janeiro).